Middle Man
06-10-2009, 11:12 AM
We touched on this briefly in a different thread. I'm interested to see what happens with the starting rotation. Assuming everyone stays healthy, should Hanson play the traditional role of the #5 guy? Should KK be "demoted" to that role? Should we try something different? What do you think?
[Disclaimer: Yes, I realize that Hanson hasn't actually won a game yet, but I don't think I'm being overly-optimistic to assume that he'll prove himself to be rotation-worthy]
Although I was one of those calling loudest for Hanson's call-up, now that he's up, I think it's wise to limit his innings. In that respect, I'm fine with him being a traditional #5 guy this season. However, I'm also concerned about duribility issues with the other 4 - especially KK and JJ.
What I'd like to see, I think, is a staight 5 man rotation with each of the 5 getting that occasional extra day off. Is it really that big of a deal, preparation-wise, for a pitcher to not stick to a strict schedule? I wouldn't think so, especially when you're adding an extra day as opposed to pitching on short rest.
With most teams, there's such a big difference in pitching quality between the #1 guy and the #5 guy, that it makes good sense to go with the traditional 4-man rotation and have the #5 guy fill in only when needed. There's no way, for example, that the Mets are going to give away a few of Santana's starts to whoever they've scraped up to pitch in the #5 spot.
I'm not sure that this is the case with the Braves, though. The Braves' strength is the depth of the rotation, in my opinion. There's just not that much difference in numbers 1 through 5. By pitching all five regularly, I think you improve the chances that you'll end up with 5 effective pitchers in September and probably also reduce the chances of overworking the bullpen.
[Disclaimer: Yes, I realize that Hanson hasn't actually won a game yet, but I don't think I'm being overly-optimistic to assume that he'll prove himself to be rotation-worthy]
Although I was one of those calling loudest for Hanson's call-up, now that he's up, I think it's wise to limit his innings. In that respect, I'm fine with him being a traditional #5 guy this season. However, I'm also concerned about duribility issues with the other 4 - especially KK and JJ.
What I'd like to see, I think, is a staight 5 man rotation with each of the 5 getting that occasional extra day off. Is it really that big of a deal, preparation-wise, for a pitcher to not stick to a strict schedule? I wouldn't think so, especially when you're adding an extra day as opposed to pitching on short rest.
With most teams, there's such a big difference in pitching quality between the #1 guy and the #5 guy, that it makes good sense to go with the traditional 4-man rotation and have the #5 guy fill in only when needed. There's no way, for example, that the Mets are going to give away a few of Santana's starts to whoever they've scraped up to pitch in the #5 spot.
I'm not sure that this is the case with the Braves, though. The Braves' strength is the depth of the rotation, in my opinion. There's just not that much difference in numbers 1 through 5. By pitching all five regularly, I think you improve the chances that you'll end up with 5 effective pitchers in September and probably also reduce the chances of overworking the bullpen.